Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Hmong
7,989
SOCIAL INDEX
77.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
94th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Russia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,097,893 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.957. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.051% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 1,050.7 Hmong.
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $38,120, a difference of 36.5%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $48,254, a difference of 31.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $84,258, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $49,364, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $56,339, a difference of 14.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,044 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,942 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,378 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,457 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,326 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,680 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,891 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,751 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $113,215 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,512 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Tragic 27.7% |
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.7%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.90%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.6% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.4% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 64.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.5% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (47.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
Family Households | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.1% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 45.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.1% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.4% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.3% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 61.3%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 60.5%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Good 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.7% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.1% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Russia vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Russia | Hmong |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.0% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Excellent 2.4% |