Immigrants from Guatemala vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,702,886 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.3%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $91,296, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $56,339, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $35,498, a difference of 0.15%), median household income ($75,123 compared to $75,839, a difference of 0.95%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $38,120, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 44.5%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (24.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 58.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.86%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 83.6%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and associate's degree (38.1% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%).