Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Philippines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Philippines

Hmong

Average
Average
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Philippines Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,424,584 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 2.2 Hmong.
Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,899 compared to $75,839, a difference of 23.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $88,115, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $84,258, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.2%), median earnings ($48,266 compared to $42,111, a difference of 14.6%), and per capita income ($44,000 compared to $38,120, a difference of 15.4%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,000
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,288
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,899
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,266
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,809
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,114
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,930
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,910
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,471
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,161
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and single female poverty (18.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 53.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.1%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.7%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households (68.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.37%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
Family Households
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.5%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.2%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.4%), bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.8%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.8%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.7%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesHmong
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%