Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Hmong
3,627
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
214th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Cuba Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,721,332 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Hmong.
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $56,339, a difference of 25.9%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and median family income ($78,249 compared to $91,296, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $49,364, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $35,498, a difference of 6.6%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $38,120, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $34,910 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $78,249 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $68,461 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,426 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $43,461 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,291 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,374 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $76,701 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $80,662 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,735 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 90.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 72.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 14.6% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.3% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.5% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 20.8% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 84.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.5%), and male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.6% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.0% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 81.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 49.5%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.7%), family households (68.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.2% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.26 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.5% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.1%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.3% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.95%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.2% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.5% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 80.2% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.5% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Cuba vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 35.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Cuba | Hmong |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Fair 12.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.7% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.4% |