Indonesian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,638,967 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Indonesian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indonesians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indonesians corresponds to an increase of 32.1 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,566 compared to $49,364, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,543 compared to $84,258, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,701 compared to $42,111, a difference of 0.98%), median male earnings ($47,503 compared to $48,254, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($36,140 compared to $35,498, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.2%), receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and single mother poverty (32.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 73.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 31.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and married-couple households (42.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.8%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, under 1 year (61.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indonesian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.69%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.4%).