Hawaiian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,782,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $56,339, a difference of 15.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $88,115, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($84,729 compared to $75,839, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,403 compared to $38,120, a difference of 3.4%), median earnings ($43,673 compared to $42,111, a difference of 3.7%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $48,254, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.4%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.81%), family poverty (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 48.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.21, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.6%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.87%).