Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Hmong
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,868,695 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Hmong.
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.2%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $35,498, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $49,364, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,837 compared to $91,296, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $88,115, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $56,339, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,195 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,837 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,341 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,462 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,474 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,644 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,722 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,673 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,462 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,030 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 27.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 38.7%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.28%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.10%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 129.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 64.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 56.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.8% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.2% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 84.8% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.0% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.7% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 40.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 38.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Hmong |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |