Argentinean vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,638,478 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.249% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 3,248.6 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $38,120, a difference of 30.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $88,115, a difference of 24.9%), and median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $48,254, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $49,364, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $56,339, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.8%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.57%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 72.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.040%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.85%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 58.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.3%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 40.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 39.5%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.2%).