Chickasaw vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,267,506 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.828% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 828.3 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,364, a difference of 10.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $75,839, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,258, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,254, a difference of 0.88%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,498, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 86.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.65%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.3%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.9%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.9%).