Ecuadorian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,563,119 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.9%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $35,498, a difference of 10.2%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $38,120, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $56,339, a difference of 2.5%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $91,296, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,739 compared to $88,115, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 36.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 59.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.0%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.13%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 119.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 56.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 37.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 49.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.97%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.4%).