Jordanian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,799,473 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 189.0 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $88,115, a difference of 24.1%), median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $48,254, a difference of 21.2%), and median household income ($91,794 compared to $75,839, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $49,364, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $56,339, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (18.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.7%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 50.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.2%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.45%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.6%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.8%).