Swiss vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,052,525 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $88,115, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($44,076 compared to $38,120, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $48,254, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $49,364, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $35,498, a difference of 6.8%), and wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.56%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 44.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.4%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (49.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.6%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.50%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 3.3%).