Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Grenada

Hmong

Poor
Average
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,398,425 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Hmong.
Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 71.2%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $35,498, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $56,339, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,517 compared to $75,839, a difference of 0.89%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $91,296, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $88,115, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,123
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Tragic
$89,249
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,517
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,596
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,279
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,932
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,538
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,311
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$85,552
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,747
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 63.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 52.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
Poverty
Tragic
15.8%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
12.4%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.8%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 105.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 57.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.2%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
Unemployment
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 52.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.85%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
67.2%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.3%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 30.9%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.21, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.5%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.1%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 261.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 155.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 130.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 43.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 101.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 130.9%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.5%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
62.7%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and college, under 1 year (59.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.11%), bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.83%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.4%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.6%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.3%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 51.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.54%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Grenada vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GrenadaHmong
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Fair
12.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.8%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
47.9%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
2.4%