Scottish vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,672,616 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 37.0 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,440 compared to $38,120, a difference of 16.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $88,115, a difference of 15.9%), and median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $48,254, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $49,364, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $35,498, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.6%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.39%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.59%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 53.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.7%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.58%), disability (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.70%).