Czech vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,505,005 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $88,115, a difference of 17.5%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $48,254, a difference of 17.2%), and per capita income ($44,595 compared to $38,120, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $49,364, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $56,339, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 23.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.4%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.020%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.1%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.65%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 50.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 37.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 2.6%), male disability (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.1%).