Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Hmong

Good
Average
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,399,480 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.815. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 59.1 Hmong.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $38,120, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $88,115, a difference of 17.4%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $75,839, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $49,364, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $56,339, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.5%), single female poverty (20.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Average
8.9%
Average
9.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Average
13.3%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.86%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.87%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.63%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.0%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 31.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileHmong
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%