Immigrants from Oceania vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,260,275 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 7.6 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $38,120, a difference of 18.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $88,115, a difference of 17.7%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $75,839, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $49,364, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $42,111, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.4%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 52.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.2%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.3%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%).