Osage vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,036,586 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.288% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 287.8 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $49,364, a difference of 7.9%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $48,254, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($39,568 compared to $38,120, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,461 compared to $84,258, a difference of 0.24%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $88,115, a difference of 0.31%), and median family income ($91,926 compared to $91,296, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.0%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 54.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 15.6%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.15%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.9%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 61.6%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.3%).