Immigrants from Fiji vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,091,585 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,933 compared to $75,839, a difference of 23.9%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $84,258, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($42,694 compared to $38,120, a difference of 12.0%), median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $48,254, a difference of 13.9%), and median earnings ($48,305 compared to $42,111, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.4%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.8%), average family size (3.45 compared to 3.21, a difference of 7.6%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.0%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 80.1%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and high school diploma (85.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.18%), college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and college, 1 year or more (56.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%).