Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Southern Europe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Southern Europe

Hmong

Average
Average
5,545
SOCIAL INDEX
53.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
174th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Southern Europe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,312,179 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 25.6 Hmong.
Immigrants from Southern Europe Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,027 compared to $38,120, a difference of 26.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $84,258, a difference of 22.8%), and median male earnings ($59,217 compared to $48,254, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $56,339, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $49,364, a difference of 10.4%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,027
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,614
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,605
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,280
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,217
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,275
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,484
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$103,486
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,775
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,902
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 16.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Average
9.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.1%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.4%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.4%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.30%), currently married (46.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.75%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.8%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.1%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 25.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.0%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.0%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.1%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.8%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Poor
92.1%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.7%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.9%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.5%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.8%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Southern EuropeHmong
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Fair
3.0%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Excellent
2.4%