Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,760,811 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $54,000, a difference of 12.7%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $88,018, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,529 compared to $39,558, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $38,202, a difference of 0.62%), and median earnings ($43,416 compared to $43,750, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 21.4%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.69%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 76.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 65.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 71.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.29%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 144.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%).