Scandinavian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,708,771 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 48.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($55,527 compared to $49,711, a difference of 11.7%), and per capita income ($43,848 compared to $39,558, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $38,202, a difference of 0.27%), householder income over 65 years ($61,586 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 60.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 49.5%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.3%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 71.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 69.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 47.2%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.060%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 148.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 27.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and associate's degree (46.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 90.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 30.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.84%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%).