Immigrants from Sweden vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,896,423 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.724% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 724.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $39,558, a difference of 40.5%), median male earnings ($65,406 compared to $49,711, a difference of 31.6%), and median family income ($122,765 compared to $95,573, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.71%), householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $60,748, a difference of 14.8%), and wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 68.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 93.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.9%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 68.7%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.5%), family households (62.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 60.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 98.9%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 93.5%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 74.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 174.8%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 48.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.4%).