Hungarian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,617,118 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 51.5 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 18.8%), median male earnings ($57,309 compared to $49,711, a difference of 15.3%), and per capita income ($45,426 compared to $39,558, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $38,202, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $54,000, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 41.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 56.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 56.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.3%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.28%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 75.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 6th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 90.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.3%).