Laotian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,344,094 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.216% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to an increase of 216.1 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($94,990 compared to $79,509, a difference of 19.5%), median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $49,711, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $88,018, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.68%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,306 compared to $60,748, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 56.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 37.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 62.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.0%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.0%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.6%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 92.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.54%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 60.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.5%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.35%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 140.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.34%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.5%).