Immigrants from Oceania vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,839,074 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 149.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $39,558, a difference of 14.3%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $49,711, a difference of 12.1%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $79,509, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.60%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $38,202, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 37.2%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 24.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 42.5%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.27%), currently married (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.37, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 78.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.85%), ged/equivalency (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 153.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.27%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.2%).