Immigrants from Guatemala vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,996,521 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 36.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $60,748, a difference of 12.6%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $95,573, a difference of 9.6%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $54,000, a difference of 5.0%), per capita income ($37,550 compared to $39,558, a difference of 5.3%), and median household income ($75,123 compared to $79,509, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.82%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (24.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 69.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.9%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.1%), currently married (42.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and married-couple households (42.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.0%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 55.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 142.6%), high school diploma (81.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and 12th grade, no diploma (84.0% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.23%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and associate's degree (38.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 140.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.4%).