Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Alaska Native
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Alaska Natives
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,905
SOCIAL INDEX
26.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
239th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Alaska Native Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,826,519 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 22.4 Alaska Natives.
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,000, a difference of 20.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $93,991, a difference of 14.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $79,509, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,711, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,750, a difference of 7.6%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $39,558, a difference of 8.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,558 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $95,573 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $79,509 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,750 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $49,711 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,202 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,000 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $88,018 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $93,991 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $60,748 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.4% |
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 19.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Poor 17.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 16.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 99.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 76.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 8.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.86%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.3%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Poor 45.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 38.3% |
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 121.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 10.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 17.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.9%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.0%), college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 37.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Alaska Native Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 69.1%), ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.8%), and female disability (15.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Alaska Native |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 52.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.4% |