Immigrants from Chile vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,198,205 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.405. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,558, a difference of 16.8%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $49,711, a difference of 12.6%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $79,509, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $60,748, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,000, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 87.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 59.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.81%), currently married (46.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 58.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.1%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.61%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 129.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.6%).