Immigrants from South America vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,655,024 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to an increase of 3.7 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,068 compared to $39,558, a difference of 11.4%), median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $49,711, a difference of 8.6%), and median household income ($85,611 compared to $79,509, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.50%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $60,748, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 27.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.98%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and poverty (12.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 69.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 53.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 53.7%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.45%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and family households (65.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 54.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 25.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.8%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 141.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 69.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.46%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.6%).