Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,522,464 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 90.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 26.4%), householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $60,748, a difference of 9.8%), and median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $38,202, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($80,402 compared to $79,509, a difference of 1.1%), median family income ($94,466 compared to $95,573, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,856 compared to $88,018, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 77.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.0%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 72.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 54.1%), and no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 36.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.2%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 162.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 79.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.9%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.0%).