Australian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,127,210 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.851% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 850.6 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,558, a difference of 31.6%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $49,711, a difference of 26.4%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $95,573, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.49%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $60,748, a difference of 10.1%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $38,202, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 62.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 43.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.34%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 67.7%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 61.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.5%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 72.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 70.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 66.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.2%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.4%).