Czech vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,354,987 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 43.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 19.4%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $49,711, a difference of 13.8%), and per capita income ($44,595 compared to $39,558, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $60,748, a difference of 0.82%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,202, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $54,000, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 69.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.2%), and family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.5%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 78.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 71.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.97%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 152.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.14%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 31.0%), bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 89.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.3%).