French American Indian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,379,983 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 28.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $60,748, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $54,000, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $93,991, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($43,333 compared to $43,750, a difference of 0.96%), per capita income ($40,244 compared to $39,558, a difference of 1.7%), and median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $49,711, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 15.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty (15.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 36.4%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (44.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (62.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 67.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.3%), bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and associate's degree (42.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 121.9%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.7%).