Immigrants from Australia vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,936,656 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.845. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.422% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 1,422.1 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $39,558, a difference of 46.5%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $49,711, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($126,620 compared to $95,573, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $54,000, a difference of 4.9%), householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $60,748, a difference of 13.9%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 70.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 82.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 65.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 77.2%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 45.3%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.0%), currently married (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (61.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.4%), no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 99.4%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 94.5%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (95.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 153.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.4%).