Osage vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,117,498 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 51.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $54,000, a difference of 18.0%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,677 compared to $60,748, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,568 compared to $39,558, a difference of 0.020%), median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $49,711, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $43,750, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and female poverty (14.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 65.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 41.6%), births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 100.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and bachelor's degree (33.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 61.0%), ambulatory disability (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and female disability (14.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.8%).