Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,755,747 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,027 compared to $39,558, a difference of 21.4%), median male earnings ($59,217 compared to $49,711, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $88,018, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.90%), householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.9%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 60.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 57.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 62.4%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (46.8% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 33.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.4%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 109.4%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.8%).