Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,986,628 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.105% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 105.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,838 compared to $39,558, a difference of 10.8%), median male earnings ($53,713 compared to $49,711, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($46,969 compared to $43,750, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $60,748, a difference of 0.67%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $88,018, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $93,991, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.6%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 69.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 68.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 44.5%), births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.7%), currently married (44.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 73.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 64.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.5%), and master's degree (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.9% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.83%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 146.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.4%).