Immigrants from Cuba vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,300,374 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $60,748, a difference of 35.8%), median family income ($78,249 compared to $95,573, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,662 compared to $93,991, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $54,000, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $39,558, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 65.5%), and receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 97.3%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 82.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 80.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.6%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (44.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 99.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 91.3%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.4%), and college, under 1 year (55.7% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 157.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.5%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.4%).