Immigrants vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,723,653 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $49,711, a difference of 9.0%), per capita income ($43,010 compared to $39,558, a difference of 8.7%), and median household income ($85,818 compared to $79,509, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $54,000, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.8%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 21.8%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.0%), poverty (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 67.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and female unemployment (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 42.7%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 2.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 89.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 148.4%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 58.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.9%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%).