Immigrants from Hungary vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,427,478 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.379% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 379.1 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,303 compared to $39,558, a difference of 24.6%), median male earnings ($59,806 compared to $49,711, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,655 compared to $88,018, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($64,277 compared to $60,748, a difference of 5.8%), and median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $38,202, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 90.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 58.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 24.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 66.9%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.3%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 56.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (90.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 114.7%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.56%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.2%).