Sri Lankan vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,124,131 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,093 compared to $79,509, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $88,018, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $93,991, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,201 compared to $60,748, a difference of 5.7%), and wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 46.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 37.3%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 78.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 69.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.9%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 32.3%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.35 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.67%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 129.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 10.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 12.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.8%), bachelor's degree (38.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 157.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.9%).