Immigrants from Malaysia vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,279,447 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 56.7 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $39,558, a difference of 26.4%), median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $49,711, a difference of 25.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $88,018, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $54,000, a difference of 0.33%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $60,748, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 86.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 67.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 71.3%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 40.0%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.0%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 63.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.43%), high school diploma (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 168.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.0%).