Immigrants from Barbados vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,589,562 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.654. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.319% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to an increase of 1,319.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 36.9%), householder income over 65 years ($53,766 compared to $60,748, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $38,202, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($78,989 compared to $79,509, a difference of 0.66%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,687 compared to $88,018, a difference of 0.76%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,163 compared to $54,000, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 36.4%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother poverty (30.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 93.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 34.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 61.6%), married-couple households (39.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 103.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 79.0%), and no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 18.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 49.7%), and no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 69.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 80.2%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 203.8%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 89.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.3%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%).