Latvian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,614,144 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 26.4 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,558, a difference of 33.1%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $49,711, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $95,573, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,000, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $60,748, a difference of 10.8%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 71.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 59.1%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 70.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 70.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 74.6%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.7%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 77.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 80.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.9%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 124.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 44.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.6%).