Indian (Asian) vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,528,976 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $39,558, a difference of 36.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $88,018, a difference of 35.8%), and median male earnings ($66,078 compared to $49,711, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $54,000, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $60,748, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 62.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 50.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 84.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 65.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 83.8%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 51.6%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 102.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 76.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and 11th grade (92.5% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 193.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.5%).