Costa Rican vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,356,429 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,090 compared to $39,558, a difference of 11.5%), median household income ($87,262 compared to $79,509, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $93,991, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $60,748, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $54,000, a difference of 1.7%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 61.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 55.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.2%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 82.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.4%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 109.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 53.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%).