Cuban vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,870,634 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $60,748, a difference of 23.6%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $95,573, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $38,202, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 5.0%), per capita income ($37,383 compared to $39,558, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $54,000, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 56.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 48.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 82.2%), male unemployment (4.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 75.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.3%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.57%), currently married (44.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 104.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 5.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.6%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 14.5%), and associate's degree (41.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 135.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.0%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.5%).