Fijian vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,325,636 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 18.8 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $93,991, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $88,018, a difference of 10.1%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $95,573, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $60,748, a difference of 7.0%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $79,509, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.0%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 0.97%), female poverty (14.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 96.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 68.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.7%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 83.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 68.3%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 146.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.83%), female disability (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.6%).