Immigrants from Western Asia vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,574,332 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to an increase of 4.5 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $39,558, a difference of 18.5%), median male earnings ($58,131 compared to $49,711, a difference of 16.9%), and median family income ($108,691 compared to $95,573, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $60,748, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $54,000, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 30.8%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 63.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 54.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.9%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 70.0%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 0.95%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 56.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.54%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 166.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.91%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.2%).